VIDEO
PDF
PDF format is widely accepted and good for printing.
Transcript(32.64 kb)
Student Work(1.18 MB)
Citation & Export
Related Resources (1)
View Analytics (1)
Statistics
Now Playing: MP4-1
Citation & Export
APA citation
Building large models to show equivalence, an exploration, Clip 1 of 4: Is there a larger model? [video]. Retrieved from https://doi.org/doi:10.7282/T3NV9GV1
Export
Related Resources (1)
Analytics (1)
Description
TitleBuilding large models to show equivalence, an exploration, Clip 1 of 4: Is there a larger model?
PublisherNew Brunswick, NJ: Robert B. Davis Institute for Learning, , c1993-10-07
Persistent URLhttps://doi.org/doi:10.7282/T3NV9GV1
DescriptionDuring this session, researcher Carolyn Maher provided the students an opportunity to revisit the task that they had been introduced to during the previous session: Which is larger, two thirds or three quarters, and by how much. The students were encouraged to build more than one or two models. The video data lent insight into the reasoning of four groups of students, whose ideas about this task will be traced below. Erik and Alan began to work on the problem by building the models that they had found the day before. First, Erik built the twenty-four centimeter-long model, and the researcher asked him to reconstruct the other model that they had found. After some trial and error, they succeeded in building the twelve centimeter-long model, first by using a train of two yellow rods and a red rod, then modifying that train to an orange rod and a red rod. Erik and Alan explained to the researcher that the first model showed that the difference between the two lengths was one twelfth or two twenty fourths, and that the first model showed that the difference was one twelfth. Alan then stated that the larger model was the only model that could show the difference in twenty-fourths. He explained that if one wanted the smaller model to contain twenty-fourths, the white rods would need to be split in half.
The researcher then challenged Erik and Alan to find another model. Erik proposed using a train of three orange rods. He then tried using a longer train of orange rods. During his exploration, he stated that the brown rods were equivalent to ten white rods, and that the orange rods were equivalent in length to twelve white rods. Alan used reasoning to show Erik the flaw in his assumption. He told Erik to line up white rods against the orange rod, and Erik concluded that the length of the orange rod was equivalent to ten white rods.
Erik then built a model using three orange rods and a dark green rod. He found that the blue rods could then be called fourths, and showed Alan what he had found. Alan then challenged him to find thirds. In a discussion, Alan showed Erik that no rod could be one third of the train that he had built. He said that the orange rod was ten white rods long, implying that the train was more than thirty white rods in length, and therefore none of the rods, the largest of which was the orange rod, could be called one third of the train. Erik agreed.
Erik then checked what Andrew and Jessica were building. Andrew had built a train of two oranges and a red rod followed by another two oranges and a red rod. Erik used Alan’s argument, telling Andrew that his train was too big and that it couldn’t be divided into anything. Andrew countered Erik’s argument by saying that if one could make a train to represent a whole, then one could make a train to represent a third or a quarter. Erik then left Andrew to join the researcher and Alan at David and Meredith’s table.
The researcher then challenged Erik and Alan to find another model. Erik proposed using a train of three orange rods. He then tried using a longer train of orange rods. During his exploration, he stated that the brown rods were equivalent to ten white rods, and that the orange rods were equivalent in length to twelve white rods. Alan used reasoning to show Erik the flaw in his assumption. He told Erik to line up white rods against the orange rod, and Erik concluded that the length of the orange rod was equivalent to ten white rods.
Erik then built a model using three orange rods and a dark green rod. He found that the blue rods could then be called fourths, and showed Alan what he had found. Alan then challenged him to find thirds. In a discussion, Alan showed Erik that no rod could be one third of the train that he had built. He said that the orange rod was ten white rods long, implying that the train was more than thirty white rods in length, and therefore none of the rods, the largest of which was the orange rod, could be called one third of the train. Erik agreed.
Erik then checked what Andrew and Jessica were building. Andrew had built a train of two oranges and a red rod followed by another two oranges and a red rod. Erik used Alan’s argument, telling Andrew that his train was too big and that it couldn’t be divided into anything. Andrew countered Erik’s argument by saying that if one could make a train to represent a whole, then one could make a train to represent a third or a quarter. Erik then left Andrew to join the researcher and Alan at David and Meredith’s table.
Math ToolCuisenaire rods
Math StrandFractions
Math ProblemFraction as number, Comparing fractions, Equivalent fractions
NCTM Grade Range3-5
NCTM Content StandardNumber and operations
NCTM Process StandardProblem solving, Reasoning and proof, Communication, Connections, Representation
Forms of Reasoning, Strategies and HeuristicsDirect reasoning, Indirect reasoning, Reasoning by upper and lower bounds
Grade Level4
Student ParticipantsAlan (student), Andrew (student), Erik (student), Jessica (student)
CorporateConover Road (Colts Neck, N.J.)
SettingClassroom
Student GenderMale
Student EthnicityWhite
Camera ViewsClassroom view, Side view
RightsThe video is protected by copyright. It is available for reviewing and use within the Video Mosaic Collaborative (VMC) portal. Please contact the Robert B. Davis Institute for Learning (RBDIL) for further information about the use of this video.
Date Captured1993-10-07
Local IdentifierA92A93-FRC-CMPRF-CLIP001
Related Publication
Type: Related publication
Label: Ed.D. dissertation references the video footage that includes Building large models to show equivalence, an exploration, Clip 1 of 4: Is there a larger model?
Date: 2009
Author: Yankelewitz, Dina (Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey)
Name: The development of mathematical reasoning in elementary school students' exploration of fraction ideas
Reference: http://hdl.rutgers.edu/1782.1/rucore10001500001.ETD.000054787
Type: Related publication
Label: Ed.D. dissertation references the video footage that includes Building large models to show equivalence, an exploration, Clip 1 of 4: Is there a larger model?
Date: 2009
Author: Yankelewitz, Dina (Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey)
Name: The development of mathematical reasoning in elementary school students' exploration of fraction ideas
Reference: http://hdl.rutgers.edu/1782.1/rucore10001500001.ETD.000054787
Related Publication
Type: Related publication
Label: Ed.D. dissertation references the video footage that includes Building large models to show equivalence, an exploration, Clip 1 of 4: Is there a larger model?
Date: 2008
Author: Reynolds, Suzanne Loveridge (Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey)
Name: A study of fourth-grade students' explorations into comparing fractions
Reference: QA.R465 2005
Type: Related publication
Label: Ed.D. dissertation references the video footage that includes Building large models to show equivalence, an exploration, Clip 1 of 4: Is there a larger model?
Date: 2008
Author: Reynolds, Suzanne Loveridge (Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey)
Name: A study of fourth-grade students' explorations into comparing fractions
Reference: QA.R465 2005
Source
Title: A92, Building large models to show equivalence, an exploration (classroom view), Grade 4, October 7, 1993, raw footage.
Identifier: A92-19931007-CNCR-CV-CLASS-GR4-FRC-CMPRF-RAW
Title: A92, Building large models to show equivalence, an exploration (classroom view), Grade 4, October 7, 1993, raw footage.
Identifier: A92-19931007-CNCR-CV-CLASS-GR4-FRC-CMPRF-RAW
Source
Title: A93, Building large models to show equivalence, an exploration (side view), Grade 4, October 7, 1993, raw footage.
Identifier: A93-19931007-CNCR-SIV-CLASS-GR4-FRC-CMPRF-RAW
Title: A93, Building large models to show equivalence, an exploration (side view), Grade 4, October 7, 1993, raw footage.
Identifier: A93-19931007-CNCR-SIV-CLASS-GR4-FRC-CMPRF-RAW